Computational Neurology

In the Computational Neurology group, we answer clinical relevant questions in the field of neuropsychiatry using computational methods. We analyze clinical and neuroimaging data using both a data-driven and a modelling-based approach (see Figure 1). This integration helps generating a better (qualitative) and robust (quantitative) understanding of pathophysiological processes of neurological diseases, as well as their diagnosis and treatment.


Figure 1: Computational neurology connects a data-driven approach (top left), a model-based approach (bottom left), and clinical data (right). © Xenia Kobeleva

The data-driven approach mainly focusses on the analysis of neurological diseases with methods of machine learning in order to identify characteristic properties of the brain structure and brain function as clinical phenotypes. The model-driven approach builds on our findings from the data-driven approach. It formalizes a mechanistic relationship between clinical data and brain function via equations; in doing so, this relationship can be meaningfully interpreted, and it extends and goes beyond mere observations. Simulated brain models exert high congruence with actual brain data (compare Figure 2).


Figure 2: Brain networks can be realistically simulated with dynamical models. The simulated brain network (left) shows high conformity to the actual clinical data (right). © Xenia Kobeleva

This kind of modelling might enable medical doctors to adapt their treatments based on patient-specific mathematical models.

Methods we use in the research group:

  • Dynamical modelling (dynamic mean field, Hopf, etc.)
  • Analyses of connectivity (structural connectivity, functional connectivity, dynamical functional connectivity, effective connectivity)
  • Pre-processing of structural and functional MRT data (including preprocessing pipelines)
  • Analyses of resting state fMRT and task fMRT
  • Neurophysiology (TMS, EMG, EEG)
  • Medical informatics
  • Open science

Group Leader

Prof. Dr. Xenia Kobeleva

Affiliated

Riccardo Leone

Pegah Majlessi

Briand Qeriqi

    2024

  • Beyond Focal Lesions: Dynamical Network Effects of White Matter Hyperintensities
    Leone, R., Geysen, S., Deco, G., & Kobeleva, X.
    Human Brain Mapping, 45(17)
  • Next-generation phenotyping integrated in a national framework for patients with ultrarare disorders improves genetic diagnostics and yields new molecular findings
    Schmidt, A., Danyel, M., Grundmann, K., Brunet, T., Klinkhammer, H., Hsieh, T. -C., et al.
    Nature Genetics, 56(8), 1644–1653
  • Retinal ganglion cell and microvascular density loss in hereditary spastic paraplegia
    Turski, G. N., Turski, C. A., Grobe-Einsler, M., Kobeleva, X., Turski, J. S., Holz, F. G., et al.
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 41(5–6), 229–239
  • 2023

  • Whole-brain modeling of the differential influences of amyloid-beta and tau in Alzheimer’s disease
    Patow, G., Stefanovski, L., Ritter, P., Deco, G., & Kobeleva, X.
    Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 15(1)
  • Linking early-life bilingualism and cognitive advantage in older adulthood
    Ballarini, T., Kuhn, E., Röske, S., Altenstein, S., Bartels, C., Buchholz, F., et al.
    Neurobiology of Aging, 124, 18–28
  • 2022

  • Midlife occupational cognitive requirements protect cognitive function in old age by increasing cognitive reserve
    Kleineidam, L., Wolfsgruber, S., Weyrauch, A. -S., Zulka, L. E., Forstmeier, S., Roeske, S., et al.
    Frontiers in Psychology, 13
  • Adult‐Onset Neurodegeneration in Nucleotide Excision Repair Disorders (NERDND): Time to Move Beyond the Skin
    Cordts, I., Önder, D., Traschütz, A., Kobeleva, X., Karin, I., Minnerop, M., et al.
    Movement Disorders, 37(8), 1707–1718
  • Coherent Structural and Functional Network Changes after Thalamic Lesions in Essential Tremor
    Pohl, E. D. R., Upadhyay, N., Kobeleva, X., Purrer, V., Maurer, A., Keil, V. C., et al.
    Movement Disorders, 37(9), 1924–1929
  • Subjective cognitive decline and stage 2 of Alzheimer disease in patients from memory centers
    Jessen, F., Wolfsgruber, S., Kleineindam, L., Spottke, A., Altenstein, S., Bartels, C., et al.
    Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 19(2), 487–497
  • Advancing brain network models to reconcile functional neuroimaging and clinical research
    Kobeleva, X., Varoquaux, G., Dagher, A., Adhikari, M. H., Grefkes, C., & Gilson, M.
    NeuroImage: Clinical, 36, 103262
  • 2021

  • Revealing the Relevant Spatiotemporal Scale Underlying Whole-Brain Dynamics
    Kobeleva, X., López-González, A., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15
  • Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences—An OHBM–Open Science perspective
    Levitis, E., van Praag, C. D. G., Gau, R., Heunis, S., DuPre, E., Kiar, G., et al.
    GigaScience, 10(8)
  • Brainhack: Developing a culture of open, inclusive, community-driven neuroscience
    Gau, R., Noble, S., Heuer, K., Bottenhorn, K. L., Bilgin, I. P., Yang, Y. -F., et al.
    Neuron, 109(11), 1769–1775
  • Brain activity is contingent on neuropsychological function in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of verbal working memory in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Kobeleva, X., Machts, J., Veit, M., Vielhaber, S., Petri, S., & Schoenfeld, M. A.
    European Journal of Neurology, 28(9), 3051–3060
  • Clinically Applicable Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Morphologic Measurements of Grey Matter Changes in the Human Brain
    Fu, T., Kobeleva, X., Bronzlik, P., Nösel, P., Dadak, M., Lanfermann, H., et al.
    Brain Sciences, 11(1), 55

Explore dynamical consequences of neurostimulation using neural mass modeling

Personalization of neurostimulation can improve its efficacy whilst taking into account the increasing complexity of the corresponding technology and the amount of technical choices (regarding stimulation location and stimulation settings). In this project we aim to create a whole-brain neural mass model that can accurately predict the effect of different neurostimulation settings in healthy and neurologically impaired individuals.

Models of pathological influences of neurodegeneratives diseases

We invite applications for students' projects and bachelor/master theses for contributing to developing models of pathological influences of neurodegeneratives diseases (i.e., Alzheimer’s Disease) on brain activity. The project touches topics of whole-brain dynamics, biomarkers, and effective connectivity (i.e., directional influences of brain regions onto each other).

The Institut für Neuroinformatik (INI) is a research unit of the Faculty of Computer Science at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Its scientific goal is to understand the fundamental principles through which organisms generate behavior and cognition while linked to their environments through sensory and effector systems. Inspired by our insights into such natural cognitive systems, we seek new solutions to problems of information processing in artificial cognitive systems. We draw from a variety of disciplines that include experimental psychology and neurophysiology as well as machine learning, neural artificial intelligence, computer vision, and robotics.

Universitätsstr. 150, Building NB, Room 3/32
D-44801 Bochum, Germany

Tel: (+49) 234 32-28967
Fax: (+49) 234 32-14210