back to main page

Results of the GECCO'2018 2-OBJ Track

"Raw" Result Data

On each problem participants were judged by the overall dominated hypervolume within the given budget of function evaluations. There were 7 participants in the field. The best function value per problem and participant (1000 times 7 double precision numbers) is listed in this text file.

Participant Ranking

Participants were ranked based on aggregated problem-wise ranks (details here and here). The following results table lists participants with overall scores (higher is better) and the sum of ranks over all problems (lower is better) The table can be sorted w.r.t. these criteria.

rank participant method name method description software paper score  sum of ranks 
1 jpsbook 858.564 1699
2 Artelys 611.344 2134
3 Jeremy Research algorithm 363.302 3034
4 Al Jimenez 129.329 3612
5 kadiri 3.12319 4699
6 anonymous953 0.867917 5973

Visualization of Performance Data

The following figure shows an aggregated view on the performance data.

The following figures show the same data, but separately for each problem dimension.