back to main page

Results of the GECCO'2018 2-OBJ expensive Track

"Raw" Result Data

On each problem participants were judged by the overall dominated hypervolume within the given budget of function evaluations. There were 7 participants in the field. The best function value per problem and participant (1000 times 7 double precision numbers) is listed in this text file.

Participant Ranking

Participants were ranked based on aggregated problem-wise ranks (details here and here). The following results table lists participants with overall scores (higher is better) and the sum of ranks over all problems (lower is better) The table can be sorted w.r.t. these criteria.

rank participant method name method description software paper score  sum of ranks 
1 Artelys 639.341 2585
2 jpsbook 434.271 2726
3 Simon Wessing MBHVMAX+ALGSS 318.925 3834
4 Jeremy Research algorithm 291.529 3062
5 Al Jimenez 265.573 3425
6 kadiri 16.89 5368

Visualization of Performance Data

The following figure shows an aggregated view on the performance data.

The following figures show the same data, but separately for each problem dimension.