back to main page

Results of the GECCO'2017 2-OBJ Track

"Raw" Result Data

On each problem participants were judged by the overall dominated hypervolume within the given budget of function evaluations. There were 7 participants in the field. The best function value per problem and participant (1000 times 7 double precision numbers) is listed in this text file.

Participant Ranking

Participants were ranked based on aggregated problem-wise ranks (details here and here). The following results table lists participants with overall scores (higher is better) and the sum of ranks over all problems (lower is better) The table can be sorted w.r.t. these criteria.

rank participant method name method description software paper score  sum of ranks 
1 Simon Wessing Restarted local search + SMS-EMOA link 888.296 2107
2 Artelys Artelys Knitro Artelys Knitro used in derivative-free mode with multistart link link 432.975 3369
3 Poly Montreal 424.929 3213
4 EMAGIN's Tomcat Emagin's Tomcat (Phoenix mode) - Developed by Mohammadamin Jahanpour 240.253 4131
5 Jeremy M Custom algorithm 203.663 4702
6 Al Jimenez 107.198 5185
7 Ralf S. Mix of PSO and GA designed for single objective optimization 69.8088 5293

Visualization of Performance Data

The following figure shows an aggregated view on the performance data.

The following figures show the same data, but separately for each problem dimension.