back to main page

Results of the GECCO'2016 2-OBJ expensive Track

"Raw" Result Data

On each problem participants were judged by the overall dominated hypervolume within the given budget of function evaluations. There were 6 participants in the field. The best function value per problem and participant (1000 times 6 double precision numbers) is listed in this text file.

Participant Ranking

Participants were ranked based on aggregated problem-wise ranks (details here and here). The following results table lists participants with overall scores (higher is better) and the sum of ranks over all problems (lower is better) The table can be sorted w.r.t. these criteria.

rank participant method name method description software paper score  sum of ranks 
1 Mohammadamin Jahanpour and Bryan Tolson Pareto archived dynamically dimensioned search (PA-DDS) Convex Hull Contribution was used as selection metric for PA-DDS link link 562.766 2526
2 Artelys Artelys Knitro Artelys Knitro used in derivative-free mode with multistart link link 467.579 3286
3 mesop MO-SOO 325.247 3262
4 Al Jimenez Curved Trajectories Algorithm (CTA) email link 226.9 3909
5 Poly Montreal 226.541 3789
6 Grays 157.496 4228

Visualization of Performance Data

The following figure shows an aggregated view on the performance data.

The following figures show the same data, but separately for each problem dimension.